Section one: Contracting authority/entity
one.1) Name and addresses
Southampton City Council
Civic Centre Road
SOUTHAMPTON
SO147LY
tendermanagement@southampton.gov.uk
Telephone
+44 2380833000
Country
United Kingdom
Region code
UKJ32 - Southampton
Justification for not providing organisation identifier
Not on any register
Internet address(es)
Main address
Section two: Object
two.1) Scope of the procurement
two.1.1) Title
Southampton City Council Children & Young People's Mental Health & Therapeutic Team
Reference number
SCC-ICU-0075
two.1.2) Main CPV code
- 85323000 - Community health services
two.1.3) Type of contract
Services
two.1.4) Short description
Southampton City Council is intending to commission a Children and Young People's Mental Health & Therapeutic Service to provide therapeutic guidance and support to enable delivery of an effective Local Authority children services, specifically supporting the work of the Children Looked After (CLA), Young Peoples Service and Specialist Assessment Service teams.
Section six. Complementary information
six.6) Original notice reference
Notice number: 2024/S 000-010408
Section seven. Changes
seven.1.2) Text to be corrected in the original notice
Section number
VI.3
Instead of
Text
This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period.
Representations by providers must be made to the relevant authority by the end of Thursday 11th April 2024. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR. The address to which any written representations are to be sent is:
tendermanagement@southampton.gov.uk
The award decision-makers were:
Donna Chapman, Associate Director, Health & Adults Social Care, Southampton ICU
Tim Nelson, Head of Young People's Services, Southampton City Council
Phil Lovegrove, Commissioner, NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight Integrated Care Board (ICB)
There were no declared actual or potential conflicts of interest of individuals making the decision.
The relative importance of the Key Criteria used to make the decision was through Key Criteria ranking as followed:
Joint 1st : Quality and Innovation AND Integration, Collaboration, and Service Sustainability:
2nd: n/a
3rd: Value
4th: Improving Access, Reducing Health Inequalities, and Facilitating Choice:
5th: Social Value
The relative importance of each Key Criteria was established by considering its importance against each of the other criteria in turn.
The rationale for choosing the most suitable provider, Solent NHS Trust, was that it was the only provider that met the Basic Selection Criteria and also met each of the Key Criteria.
Read
Text
This is a Contract Award Notice - (Confirmation): Provider Selection Regime (PSR). The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. This notice is to confirm the award of this contract to the Provider stated below, following the Most Suitable Provider Process.
Supplier Details:
Solent NHS Trust
Highpoint Venue
Southampton
SO19 8BR
Total value of the contract: £1,410,300
Confirmation of dates between which the services are to be provided: 12th April 2024- 11th April 2027
The award decision-makers were:
Donna Chapman, Associate Director, Health & Adults Social Care, Southampton ICU
Tim Nelson, Head of Young People's Services, Southampton City Council
Phil Lovegrove, Commissioner, NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight Integrated Care Board (ICB)
There were no declared actual or potential conflicts of interest of individuals making the decision.
The relative importance of the Key Criteria used to make the decision was through Key Criteria ranking as followed:
Joint 1st : Quality and Innovation AND Integration, Collaboration, and Service Sustainability:
2nd: n/a
3rd: Value
4th: Improving Access, Reducing Health Inequalities, and Facilitating Choice:
5th: Social Value
The relative importance of each Key Criteria was established by considering its importance against each of the other criteria in turn.
The rationale for choosing the most suitable provider, Solent NHS Trust, was that it was the only provider that met the Basic Selection Criteria and also met each of the Key Criteria.