Contract

Chronic Fatigue Services - Physiotherapy

  • HUMBER TEACHING NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

F03: Contract award notice

Notice identifier: 2024/S 000-030020

Procurement identifier (OCID): ocds-h6vhtk-02f9c1

Published 19 September 2024, 2:21pm



Section one: Contracting authority

one.1) Name and addresses

HUMBER TEACHING NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

WILLERBY HILL

HULL

HU106ED

Contact

Charlene Reeson

Email

c.reeson@nhs.net

Telephone

+44 7825090915

Country

United Kingdom

Region code

UKE12 - East Riding of Yorkshire

NHS Organisation Data Service

RV9

Internet address(es)

Main address

https://www.humber.nhs.uk/

one.4) Type of the contracting authority

Body governed by public law

one.5) Main activity

Health


Section two: Object

two.1) Scope of the procurement

two.1.1) Title

Chronic Fatigue Services - Physiotherapy

two.1.2) Main CPV code

  • 98000000 - Other community, social and personal services

two.1.3) Type of contract

Services

two.1.4) Short description

Physiotherapy Chronic Fatigue Services.

two.1.6) Information about lots

This contract is divided into lots: No

two.2) Description

two.2.3) Place of performance

NUTS codes
  • UKE - Yorkshire and the Humber

two.2.4) Description of the procurement

This is a notice of intension to award a contract under the most suitable provider process for the following services.

CFS is a complex, chronic medical condition in which people often experience a fluctuation in symptoms. In summary, the service will provide specialist assessment and treatment to meet the needs of people with CFS, whilst ensuring treatment interventions meet the standards required for HCPC Proficiency. The service will be delivered during the period of 09:00-17:00 Monday-Friday and from the provider's premises. Referrals for the service currently average around 16 pcm.

This is an existing service that will be provided by a new supplier, between the dates of Oct 2024 until Sept 2025.

Approx. lifetime value of the contract will be £10,000.00 pa

two.2.5) Award criteria

Cost criterion - Name: Most suitable provider process with regard to the key criteria / Weighting: 100

two.2.11) Information about options

Options: No


Section four. Procedure

four.1) Description

four.1.1) Type of procedure

Award of a contract without prior publication of a call for competition in the cases listed below

  • The procurement falls outside the scope of application of the regulations

Explanation:

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to ward notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be made to decision makers by the 01/10/2024. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR.

four.1.8) Information about the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA)

The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement: No

four.2) Administrative information

four.2.1) Previous publication concerning this procedure

Notice number: 2021/S 000-029266


Section five. Award of contract

A contract/lot is awarded: No

five.1) Information on non-award

The contract/lot is not awarded

Other reasons (discontinuation of procedure)


Section six. Complementary information

six.3) Additional information

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of tis contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contract Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be made to the relevant authority by 01/10/2024. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR. Written representations are to be emailed to Phillip.Simmons@nhs.net.

The award decision-makers for HTFT were Marie Acton and Adrian Elsworth.

Any declared or potential conflicts of interest were managed as per the Trusts policy.

The relative importance of the key criteria was measured by the following:

Quality and Innovation 50%

Value 20%

Integration, Collaboration, and Service Sustainability 10%

Improving access, reducing health inequalities and facilitating choice 10%

Social Value 10%.

The provider was chosen due attaining the highest score when evaluating against the Key Criteria.

six.4) Procedures for review

six.4.1) Review body

The Independent Patient Choice and Procurement Panel

National

Country

United Kingdom