Contract

Additional Primary Care Capacity - Out of hours Base Visits

  • NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board

F03: Contract award notice

Notice identifier: 2025/S 000-008104

Procurement identifier (OCID): ocds-h6vhtk-04e9e6

Published 5 March 2025, 4:32pm



Section one: Contracting authority

one.1) Name and addresses

NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board

Sackville House, Brooks Close

Lewes

BN7 2FZ

Contact

Robert Kitt

Email

robert.kitt1@nhs.net

Telephone

+44 7823534547

Country

United Kingdom

Region code

UKJ2 - Surrey, East and West Sussex

NHS Organisation Data Service

QNX

Internet address(es)

Main address

https://www.sussex.ics.nhs.uk/

one.4) Type of the contracting authority

Body governed by public law

one.5) Main activity

Health


Section two: Object

two.1) Scope of the procurement

two.1.1) Title

Additional Primary Care Capacity - Out of hours Base Visits

Reference number

C231748

two.1.2) Main CPV code

  • 85100000 - Health services

two.1.3) Type of contract

Services

two.1.4) Short description

Delivery of additional primary care capacity to support UTC delivery at sites including Princess Royal Hospital and Crawley Hospital.

Delivery of a proportion of UTC provision at Worthing General Hospital and St Richards Hospital

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) Intention to Award Notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 or the Procurement Regulations 2024 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period.

Representations by providers must be submitted to the relevant authority via email to robert.kitt1@nhs.net (Reference no. C231748) by midnight (23:59) on 17/03/25. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR.

This direct award is for a maximum period of 24 months, from 1/4/25 to 31/3/27.

The service value is £1,507,437 per annum.

two.1.6) Information about lots

This contract is divided into lots: No

two.1.7) Total value of the procurement (excluding VAT)

Value excluding VAT: £3,014,874

two.2) Description

two.2.2) Additional CPV code(s)

  • 85100000 - Health services

two.2.3) Place of performance

NUTS codes
  • UKJ2 - Surrey, East and West Sussex
Main site or place of performance

Sussex

two.2.4) Description of the procurement

Delivery of additional primary care capacity to support UTC delivery at sites including Princess Royal Hospital and Crawley Hospital.

Delivery of a proportion of UTC provision at Worthing General Hospital and St Richards Hospital

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice under Direct Award Process C. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 and the Procurement Regulations 2024 do not apply to this award.

The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be submitted to the relevant authority via email to robert.kitt1@nhs.net (Reference no. C231748) by midnight (23:59) on 17/03/25. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR.

This direct award is for a maximum period of 24 months, from 1/4/25 to 31/3/27.

The service value is £1,507,437 per annum.

two.2.5) Award criteria

Quality criterion - Name: The existing provider is satisfying the original contract and will likely satisfy the proposed contract to a sufficient standard. / Weighting: 100

Cost criterion - Name: N/A / Weighting: 0

two.2.11) Information about options

Options: No


Section four. Procedure

four.1) Description

four.1.1) Type of procedure

Award of a contract without prior publication of a call for competition in the cases listed below

  • The procurement falls outside the scope of application of the regulations

Explanation:

This procurement falls under the Provider Selection Regime 2023 (Direct Award Process C).

four.1.8) Information about the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA)

The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement: No


Section five. Award of contract

Contract No

C231748

A contract/lot is awarded: Yes

five.2) Award of contract

five.2.1) Date of conclusion of the contract

27 February 2025

five.2.2) Information about tenders

Number of tenders received: 1

The contract has been awarded to a group of economic operators: No

five.2.3) Name and address of the contractor

Alliance for Better Care Limited

120 Victoria Road

Horley

RH6 7BL

Country

United Kingdom

NUTS code
  • UKJ2 - Surrey, East and West Sussex
Companies House

09329846

The contractor is an SME

No

five.2.4) Information on value of contract/lot (excluding VAT)

Total value of the contract/lot: £3,014,874


Section six. Complementary information

six.3) Additional information

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) Intention to Award Notice under Direct Award Process C. The awarding of this

contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 or Procurement Regulations 2024 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill

period.

Representations by providers must be submitted to the relevant authority via email to robert.kitt1@nhs.net (Reference no. C231748) by midnight (23:59) on 17/03/25.

This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR.

Decision maker: Deputy Chief Delivery and Strategy Officer, and Director of Strategic Commissioning, NHS Sussex ICB.

No conflicts of interest were declared.

The service evaluation was reviewed against the 5 key criteria:

• Quality & Innovation

• Value

• Integration, collaboration & service sustainability

• Improving access, reducing health inequalities and facilitating choice

• Social value

These were then weighted as follows:

Quality and innovation (30%),

Value (10%),

Integration, collaboration and service sustainability (30%), Improving access, reducing health inequalities and facilitating choice (20%);

Social Value (10%).

In determining the weightings for each of the criteria, our primary focus was on ensuring that the evaluation process reflects the key priorities and objectives of the service.

Quality & Innovation: Quality and innovation are fundamental

to ensuring a high standard of care and continuous improvement within the service. This weighting reflects the importance of maintaining clinical excellence and fostering innovative

approaches to improve patient outcomes and experience. It aligns with the need for the service to adapt to changing healthcare demands and deliver value-added improvements.

Value: While value is critical in ensuring the service is cost-effective and delivers outcomes within budget, it is less heavily

weighted because other criteria, such as quality, integration, and access, play a more direct role in delivering patient-centred

care. This weighting reflects the need to achieve financial sustainability while prioritising other key aspects of

the service.

Integration, Collaboration, and Service Sustainability: Integration is essential for creating seamless care pathways and ensuring

collaborative working across services. This criterion is heavily weighted because the service must work effectively within the broader health and care system to ensure sustainability

and optimal service delivery. Effective integration also supports enhanced patient records and system-wide collaboration, which are vital for long-term success.

Improving Access, Reducing Health Inequalities, and Facilitating Choice: This criterion acknowledges the importance of equitable access to services and the need to address health inequalities. A higher weighting reflects the service's role in reaching underserved populations, promoting inclusivity, and ensuring that patients have meaningful choices about their care. Improving access also directly supports the delivery of integrated and

patient-focused care.

Social Value: Social value is important for ensuring that the service positively impacts the community and contributes to broader societal goals. While this is a key consideration, it is assigned a minimum weighting because other criteria, such as

quality, access, and integration, have a more direct impact on patient outcomes.

The existing provider was assessed against key criteria which were weighted according to importance in terms of service delivery and

scored satisfactorily against the assessed criteria.

six.4) Procedures for review

six.4.1) Review body

NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board

Sackville House, Brooks Close

Lewes

BN7 2FZ

Country

United Kingdom

six.4.2) Body responsible for mediation procedures

NHS England

Skipton House, 80 London Road

LONDON

SE1 6LH

Country

United Kingdom

Internet address

https://www.england.nhs.uk/