{ "uri": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/api/1.0/ocdsRecordPackages/ocds-h6vhtk-0779c4", "publisher": { "name": "Cabinet Office", "scheme": "GB-GOR", "uid": "D2", "uri": "https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/cabinet-office" }, "publishedDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "license": "http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/", "publicationPolicy": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-contracting", "version": "1.1", "extensions": [ "https://standard.open-contracting.org/profiles/eu/latest/en/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_amendment_rationale_classifications_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_budget_breakdown_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_contract_completion_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_documentation_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_pagination_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_suitability_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/portaledcahn/ocds_Links_extension/main/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cabinetoffice/ocds_uk_extension/main/extension.json" ], "packages": [ "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/api/1.0/ocdsRecordPackages/ocds-h6vhtk-0779c4" ], "records": [ { "ocid": "ocds-h6vhtk-0779c4", "releases": [ { "ocid": "ocds-h6vhtk-0779c4", "id": "090677-2026", "tag": [ "planning" ], "date": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "initiationType": "tender", "parties": [ { "name": "Guildford Borough Council", "id": "GB-PPON-PRYN-3355-CPMV", "identifier": { "scheme": "GB-PPON", "id": "PRYN-3355-CPMV" }, "address": { "streetAddress": "Millmead House, Millmead", "locality": "Guildford", "postalCode": "GU2 4BB", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom", "region": "UKJ25" }, "contactPoint": { "name": "Procurement", "email": "procurement@guildford.gov.uk", "telephone": "+441483505050" }, "roles": [ "buyer" ], "details": { "classifications": [ { "scheme": "UK_CA_TYPE", "id": "publicAuthoritySubCentralGovernment", "description": "Public authority - sub-central government" } ] } } ], "buyer": { "id": "GB-PPON-PRYN-3355-CPMV", "name": "Guildford Borough Council" }, "planning": { "milestones": [ { "id": "engagement", "type": "engagement", "description": "Dear Supplier,\nThe Council is currently undertaking pre-market engagement in relation to potential suicide prevention works at its multi-storey car parks.\nFor one car park work is required to install new vehicular edge protection alongside suicide prevention works, and for all car parks the Council has a requirement to consider immediate, temporary suicide prevention remedies.\nThe purpose of this exercise is to gain a better understanding of the current market, available solutions, delivery models, indicative costs, timescales, technical considerations and potential procurement routes. The information gathered will help inform the Council’s requirements and future procurement strategy.\nPlease note that this is not a procurement exercise, invitation to tender or request for a quotation. Responses will not be evaluated, scored or used to select suppliers, and participation in this exercise will not provide any advantage or disadvantage in relation to any future procurement opportunity.\nThe Council is not committed to proceeding with a procurement exercise as a result of this market engagement and reserves the right to amend, defer or not proceed with any future requirement.\nAny information provided should therefore be considered as market intelligence only. Suppliers should not incur any costs in responding, and the Council will not be responsible for any costs associated with participation in this exercise.\nWe would be grateful if you could provide a response in PDF form and return it by Thursday, 1st October 2026.\nThank you for taking the time to engage with the Council and for sharing your expertise and experience.\nKind regards,\nProcurement\nGuildford Borough Council\nPurpose: To obtain market intelligence to inform the Council’s procurement strategy, technical requirements, delivery model and potential route to market. Responses should be treated as indicative market information and not as a request for a binding quotation.\n1. Supplier Information\nOrganisation name and contact details.\nBrief description of your organisation and relevant capabilities.\nYears of experience delivering suicide prevention / fall-prevention measures.\nRelevant experience in MSCPs.\nRelevant public-sector/local-authority experience.\nDetails of similar projects delivered within the last 5 years, including approximate value and location.\n2. Understanding of the Requirement\nPlease describe your understanding of the challenges associated with implementing suicide prevention measures within operational MSCPs.\nWhat factors should a local authority consider when determining the most appropriate solution?\nWhat should a local authority consider in determining an appropriate immediate temporary solution to suicide prevention works.\nAre there particular characteristics of MSCPs that materially affect the design or installation approach?\n3. Potential Solutions\nType/design of barrier or prevention system.\nTypical height/specification.\nMaterials and expected lifespan.\nFixing/anchoring methodology.\nCompatibility with existing structures.\nImpact on ventilation, lighting and drainage.\nStructural load implications\nCombining installation of vehicular edge protection measures\nFire strategy considerations\nImpact on vehicle/pedestrian movements.\nAnti-climb considerations.\nVisibility/aesthetics.\nMaintenance requirements of the system and the external facades.\nResistance to vandalism/weathering.\n4. Design Responsibility\nWould you typically provide the design?\nIf so, what level of design would you undertake?\nHow would structural engineering input /fire safety assessments be included?\nWould you expect the Council to appoint an independent structural engineer/design consultant?\nCan you provide a design-and-build solution?\nWhat information would you require from the Council to develop a proposal?\n5. Installation\nTypical installation methodology.\nTypical programme for one MSCP.\nExpected mobilisation period.\nNumber of operatives required.\nWorking-at-height arrangements.\nRequirements for temporary closures or traffic management.\nAbility to undertake works while the car park remains operational.\nTypical installation productivity (e.g. metres/day).\n6. Disruption\nWhat level of disruption should the Council expect?\nCan works be phased? Yes this can happen definitely\nCan individual decks/areas be isolated rather than closing the whole facility?\nWhat temporary protection would be required?\nWhat measures would you recommend to maintain public safety during installation?\n7. Programme\nIndicative timescale from appointment to completion.\nLead times for materials.\nCurrent capacity to undertake works.\nAny factors likely to affect programme.\nWhether works could be delivered across multiple MSCPs as a programme.\n8. Cost Information\nTypical cost basis (e.g. £/linear metre).\nIndicative design costs.\nSurvey/investigation costs.\nInstallation costs.\nTraffic management/temporary works. Scaffolding will be a considerable cost depending on whether the system can be installed inside or not. But in reality there will need to be a safe system of working in place and this will cost.\nAny significant additional costs.\nTypical percentage allowance for preliminaries/overheads.\nMaintenance/whole-life costs.\n9. Procurement / Commercial Model\nWhat procurement route would you consider most appropriate?\nWould you recommend design and build; separate design consultant and construction contractor; specialist supplier appointed directly; framework; or another model?\nCould your organisation act as principal contractor?\nCould you work as a specialist subcontractor to a main contractor?\nWhich procurement frameworks, if any, could potentially facilitate this requirement?\nWould you anticipate the requirement being attractive as a standalone contract or a multi-site programme?", "dueDate": "2026-10-01T23:59:59Z", "status": "scheduled" } ], "documents": [ { "id": "090677-2026", "documentType": "marketEngagementNotice", "noticeType": "UK2", "description": "Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender", "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/090677-2026", "datePublished": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "format": "text/html" } ] }, "tender": { "id": "ocds-h6vhtk-0779c4", "legalBasis": { "id": "2023/54", "scheme": "UKPGA", "uri": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/54/contents" }, "title": "Suicide Prevention Works – Multi-Storey Car Parks", "description": "Dear Supplier,\nThe Council is currently undertaking pre-market engagement in relation to potential suicide prevention works at its multi-storey car parks.\nFor one car park work is required to install new vehicular edge protection alongside suicide prevention works, and for all car parks the Council has a requirement to consider immediate, temporary suicide prevention remedies.\nThe purpose of this exercise is to gain a better understanding of the current market, available solutions, delivery models, indicative costs, timescales, technical considerations and potential procurement routes. The information gathered will help inform the Council’s requirements and future procurement strategy.\nPlease note that this is not a procurement exercise, invitation to tender or request for a quotation. Responses will not be evaluated, scored or used to select suppliers, and participation in this exercise will not provide any advantage or disadvantage in relation to any future procurement opportunity.\nThe Council is not committed to proceeding with a procurement exercise as a result of this market engagement and reserves the right to amend, defer or not proceed with any future requirement.\nAny information provided should therefore be considered as market intelligence only. Suppliers should not incur any costs in responding, and the Council will not be responsible for any costs associated with participation in this exercise.\nWe would be grateful if you could provide a response in PDF form and return it by Thursday, 1st October 2026.\nThank you for taking the time to engage with the Council and for sharing your expertise and experience.\nKind regards,\nProcurement\nGuildford Borough Council\nPurpose: To obtain market intelligence to inform the Council’s procurement strategy, technical requirements, delivery model and potential route to market. Responses should be treated as indicative market information and not as a request for a binding quotation.\n1. Supplier Information\nOrganisation name and contact details.\nBrief description of your organisation and relevant capabilities.\nYears of experience delivering suicide prevention / fall-prevention measures.\nRelevant experience in MSCPs.\nRelevant public-sector/local-authority experience.\nDetails of similar projects delivered within the last 5 years, including approximate value and location.\n2. Understanding of the Requirement\nPlease describe your understanding of the challenges associated with implementing suicide prevention measures within operational MSCPs.\nWhat factors should a local authority consider when determining the most appropriate solution?\nWhat should a local authority consider in determining an appropriate immediate temporary solution to suicide prevention works.\nAre there particular characteristics of MSCPs that materially affect the design or installation approach?\n3. Potential Solutions\nType/design of barrier or prevention system.\nTypical height/specification.\nMaterials and expected lifespan.\nFixing/anchoring methodology.\nCompatibility with existing structures.\nImpact on ventilation, lighting and drainage.\nStructural load implications\nCombining installation of vehicular edge protection measures\nFire strategy considerations\nImpact on vehicle/pedestrian movements.\nAnti-climb considerations.\nVisibility/aesthetics.\nMaintenance requirements of the system and the external facades.\nResistance to vandalism/weathering.\n4. Design Responsibility\nWould you typically provide the design?\nIf so, what level of design would you undertake?\nHow would structural engineering input /fire safety assessments be included?\nWould you expect the Council to appoint an independent structural engineer/design consultant?\nCan you provide a design-and-build solution?\nWhat information would you require from the Council to develop a proposal?\n5. Installation\nTypical installation methodology.\nTypical programme for one MSCP.\nExpected mobilisation period.\nNumber of operatives required.\nWorking-at-height arrangements.\nRequirements for temporary closures or traffic management.\nAbility to undertake works while the car park remains operational.\nTypical installation productivity (e.g. metres/day).\n6. Disruption\nWhat level of disruption should the Council expect?\nCan works be phased? Yes this can happen definitely\nCan individual decks/areas be isolated rather than closing the whole facility?\nWhat temporary protection would be required?\nWhat measures would you recommend to maintain public safety during installation?\n7. Programme\nIndicative timescale from appointment to completion.\nLead times for materials.\nCurrent capacity to undertake works.\nAny factors likely to affect programme.\nWhether works could be delivered across multiple MSCPs as a programme.\n8. Cost Information\nTypical cost basis (e.g. £/linear metre).\nIndicative design costs.\nSurvey/investigation costs.\nInstallation costs.\nTraffic management/temporary works. Scaffolding will be a considerable cost depending on whether the system can be installed inside or not. But in reality there will need to be a safe system of working in place and this will cost.\nAny significant additional costs.\nTypical percentage allowance for preliminaries/overheads.\nMaintenance/whole-life costs.\n9. Procurement / Commercial Model\nWhat procurement route would you consider most appropriate?\nWould you recommend design and build; separate design consultant and construction contractor; specialist supplier appointed directly; framework; or another model?\nCould your organisation act as principal contractor?\nCould you work as a specialist subcontractor to a main contractor?\nWhich procurement frameworks, if any, could potentially facilitate this requirement?\nWould you anticipate the requirement being attractive as a standalone contract or a multi-site programme?", "items": [ { "id": "1", "additionalClassifications": [ { "scheme": "CPV", "id": "34926000", "description": "Car park control equipment" }, { "scheme": "CPV", "id": "45213312", "description": "Car park building construction work" }, { "scheme": "CPV", "id": "98351000", "description": "Car park management services" } ], "deliveryAddresses": [ { "region": "UKC", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKD", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKE", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKF", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKG", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKH", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKI", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKJ", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKK", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" } ], "relatedLot": "1" } ], "mainProcurementCategory": "works", "aboveThreshold": false, "techniques": { "hasFrameworkAgreement": true }, "lots": [ { "id": "1", "suitability": { "sme": true }, "contractPeriod": { "startDate": "2026-10-16T00:00:00Z", "endDate": "2027-10-15T23:59:59Z" }, "status": "planning" } ], "communication": { "futureNoticeDate": "2026-10-15T23:59:59Z" }, "status": "planning" }, "language": "en", "extensions": [ "https://standard.open-contracting.org/profiles/eu/latest/en/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_amendment_rationale_classifications_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_budget_breakdown_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_contract_completion_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_documentation_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_pagination_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_suitability_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/portaledcahn/ocds_Links_extension/main/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cabinetoffice/ocds_uk_extension/main/extension.json" ] } ], "compiledRelease": { "tag": [ "compiled" ], "id": "ocds-h6vhtk-0779c4-2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "date": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "ocid": "ocds-h6vhtk-0779c4", "initiationType": "tender", "parties": [ { "id": "GB-PPON-PRYN-3355-CPMV", "name": "Guildford Borough Council", "identifier": { "scheme": "GB-PPON", "id": "PRYN-3355-CPMV" }, "address": { "streetAddress": "Millmead House, Millmead", "locality": "Guildford", "postalCode": "GU2 4BB", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom", "region": "UKJ25" }, "contactPoint": { "name": "Procurement", "email": "procurement@guildford.gov.uk", "telephone": "+441483505050" }, "roles": [ "buyer" ], "details": { "classifications": [ { "scheme": "UK_CA_TYPE", "id": "publicAuthoritySubCentralGovernment", "description": "Public authority - sub-central government" } ] } } ], "buyer": { "id": "GB-PPON-PRYN-3355-CPMV", "name": "Guildford Borough Council" }, "planning": { "milestones": [ { "id": "engagement", "type": "engagement", "description": "Dear Supplier,\nThe Council is currently undertaking pre-market engagement in relation to potential suicide prevention works at its multi-storey car parks.\nFor one car park work is required to install new vehicular edge protection alongside suicide prevention works, and for all car parks the Council has a requirement to consider immediate, temporary suicide prevention remedies.\nThe purpose of this exercise is to gain a better understanding of the current market, available solutions, delivery models, indicative costs, timescales, technical considerations and potential procurement routes. The information gathered will help inform the Council’s requirements and future procurement strategy.\nPlease note that this is not a procurement exercise, invitation to tender or request for a quotation. Responses will not be evaluated, scored or used to select suppliers, and participation in this exercise will not provide any advantage or disadvantage in relation to any future procurement opportunity.\nThe Council is not committed to proceeding with a procurement exercise as a result of this market engagement and reserves the right to amend, defer or not proceed with any future requirement.\nAny information provided should therefore be considered as market intelligence only. Suppliers should not incur any costs in responding, and the Council will not be responsible for any costs associated with participation in this exercise.\nWe would be grateful if you could provide a response in PDF form and return it by Thursday, 1st October 2026.\nThank you for taking the time to engage with the Council and for sharing your expertise and experience.\nKind regards,\nProcurement\nGuildford Borough Council\nPurpose: To obtain market intelligence to inform the Council’s procurement strategy, technical requirements, delivery model and potential route to market. Responses should be treated as indicative market information and not as a request for a binding quotation.\n1. Supplier Information\nOrganisation name and contact details.\nBrief description of your organisation and relevant capabilities.\nYears of experience delivering suicide prevention / fall-prevention measures.\nRelevant experience in MSCPs.\nRelevant public-sector/local-authority experience.\nDetails of similar projects delivered within the last 5 years, including approximate value and location.\n2. Understanding of the Requirement\nPlease describe your understanding of the challenges associated with implementing suicide prevention measures within operational MSCPs.\nWhat factors should a local authority consider when determining the most appropriate solution?\nWhat should a local authority consider in determining an appropriate immediate temporary solution to suicide prevention works.\nAre there particular characteristics of MSCPs that materially affect the design or installation approach?\n3. Potential Solutions\nType/design of barrier or prevention system.\nTypical height/specification.\nMaterials and expected lifespan.\nFixing/anchoring methodology.\nCompatibility with existing structures.\nImpact on ventilation, lighting and drainage.\nStructural load implications\nCombining installation of vehicular edge protection measures\nFire strategy considerations\nImpact on vehicle/pedestrian movements.\nAnti-climb considerations.\nVisibility/aesthetics.\nMaintenance requirements of the system and the external facades.\nResistance to vandalism/weathering.\n4. Design Responsibility\nWould you typically provide the design?\nIf so, what level of design would you undertake?\nHow would structural engineering input /fire safety assessments be included?\nWould you expect the Council to appoint an independent structural engineer/design consultant?\nCan you provide a design-and-build solution?\nWhat information would you require from the Council to develop a proposal?\n5. Installation\nTypical installation methodology.\nTypical programme for one MSCP.\nExpected mobilisation period.\nNumber of operatives required.\nWorking-at-height arrangements.\nRequirements for temporary closures or traffic management.\nAbility to undertake works while the car park remains operational.\nTypical installation productivity (e.g. metres/day).\n6. Disruption\nWhat level of disruption should the Council expect?\nCan works be phased? Yes this can happen definitely\nCan individual decks/areas be isolated rather than closing the whole facility?\nWhat temporary protection would be required?\nWhat measures would you recommend to maintain public safety during installation?\n7. Programme\nIndicative timescale from appointment to completion.\nLead times for materials.\nCurrent capacity to undertake works.\nAny factors likely to affect programme.\nWhether works could be delivered across multiple MSCPs as a programme.\n8. Cost Information\nTypical cost basis (e.g. £/linear metre).\nIndicative design costs.\nSurvey/investigation costs.\nInstallation costs.\nTraffic management/temporary works. Scaffolding will be a considerable cost depending on whether the system can be installed inside or not. But in reality there will need to be a safe system of working in place and this will cost.\nAny significant additional costs.\nTypical percentage allowance for preliminaries/overheads.\nMaintenance/whole-life costs.\n9. Procurement / Commercial Model\nWhat procurement route would you consider most appropriate?\nWould you recommend design and build; separate design consultant and construction contractor; specialist supplier appointed directly; framework; or another model?\nCould your organisation act as principal contractor?\nCould you work as a specialist subcontractor to a main contractor?\nWhich procurement frameworks, if any, could potentially facilitate this requirement?\nWould you anticipate the requirement being attractive as a standalone contract or a multi-site programme?", "dueDate": "2026-10-01T23:59:59Z", "status": "scheduled" } ], "documents": [ { "id": "090677-2026", "documentType": "marketEngagementNotice", "noticeType": "UK2", "description": "Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender", "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/090677-2026", "datePublished": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "format": "text/html" } ] }, "tender": { "id": "ocds-h6vhtk-0779c4", "legalBasis": { "id": "2023/54", "scheme": "UKPGA", "uri": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/54/contents" }, "title": "Suicide Prevention Works – Multi-Storey Car Parks", "description": "Dear Supplier,\nThe Council is currently undertaking pre-market engagement in relation to potential suicide prevention works at its multi-storey car parks.\nFor one car park work is required to install new vehicular edge protection alongside suicide prevention works, and for all car parks the Council has a requirement to consider immediate, temporary suicide prevention remedies.\nThe purpose of this exercise is to gain a better understanding of the current market, available solutions, delivery models, indicative costs, timescales, technical considerations and potential procurement routes. The information gathered will help inform the Council’s requirements and future procurement strategy.\nPlease note that this is not a procurement exercise, invitation to tender or request for a quotation. Responses will not be evaluated, scored or used to select suppliers, and participation in this exercise will not provide any advantage or disadvantage in relation to any future procurement opportunity.\nThe Council is not committed to proceeding with a procurement exercise as a result of this market engagement and reserves the right to amend, defer or not proceed with any future requirement.\nAny information provided should therefore be considered as market intelligence only. Suppliers should not incur any costs in responding, and the Council will not be responsible for any costs associated with participation in this exercise.\nWe would be grateful if you could provide a response in PDF form and return it by Thursday, 1st October 2026.\nThank you for taking the time to engage with the Council and for sharing your expertise and experience.\nKind regards,\nProcurement\nGuildford Borough Council\nPurpose: To obtain market intelligence to inform the Council’s procurement strategy, technical requirements, delivery model and potential route to market. Responses should be treated as indicative market information and not as a request for a binding quotation.\n1. Supplier Information\nOrganisation name and contact details.\nBrief description of your organisation and relevant capabilities.\nYears of experience delivering suicide prevention / fall-prevention measures.\nRelevant experience in MSCPs.\nRelevant public-sector/local-authority experience.\nDetails of similar projects delivered within the last 5 years, including approximate value and location.\n2. Understanding of the Requirement\nPlease describe your understanding of the challenges associated with implementing suicide prevention measures within operational MSCPs.\nWhat factors should a local authority consider when determining the most appropriate solution?\nWhat should a local authority consider in determining an appropriate immediate temporary solution to suicide prevention works.\nAre there particular characteristics of MSCPs that materially affect the design or installation approach?\n3. Potential Solutions\nType/design of barrier or prevention system.\nTypical height/specification.\nMaterials and expected lifespan.\nFixing/anchoring methodology.\nCompatibility with existing structures.\nImpact on ventilation, lighting and drainage.\nStructural load implications\nCombining installation of vehicular edge protection measures\nFire strategy considerations\nImpact on vehicle/pedestrian movements.\nAnti-climb considerations.\nVisibility/aesthetics.\nMaintenance requirements of the system and the external facades.\nResistance to vandalism/weathering.\n4. Design Responsibility\nWould you typically provide the design?\nIf so, what level of design would you undertake?\nHow would structural engineering input /fire safety assessments be included?\nWould you expect the Council to appoint an independent structural engineer/design consultant?\nCan you provide a design-and-build solution?\nWhat information would you require from the Council to develop a proposal?\n5. Installation\nTypical installation methodology.\nTypical programme for one MSCP.\nExpected mobilisation period.\nNumber of operatives required.\nWorking-at-height arrangements.\nRequirements for temporary closures or traffic management.\nAbility to undertake works while the car park remains operational.\nTypical installation productivity (e.g. metres/day).\n6. Disruption\nWhat level of disruption should the Council expect?\nCan works be phased? Yes this can happen definitely\nCan individual decks/areas be isolated rather than closing the whole facility?\nWhat temporary protection would be required?\nWhat measures would you recommend to maintain public safety during installation?\n7. Programme\nIndicative timescale from appointment to completion.\nLead times for materials.\nCurrent capacity to undertake works.\nAny factors likely to affect programme.\nWhether works could be delivered across multiple MSCPs as a programme.\n8. Cost Information\nTypical cost basis (e.g. £/linear metre).\nIndicative design costs.\nSurvey/investigation costs.\nInstallation costs.\nTraffic management/temporary works. Scaffolding will be a considerable cost depending on whether the system can be installed inside or not. But in reality there will need to be a safe system of working in place and this will cost.\nAny significant additional costs.\nTypical percentage allowance for preliminaries/overheads.\nMaintenance/whole-life costs.\n9. Procurement / Commercial Model\nWhat procurement route would you consider most appropriate?\nWould you recommend design and build; separate design consultant and construction contractor; specialist supplier appointed directly; framework; or another model?\nCould your organisation act as principal contractor?\nCould you work as a specialist subcontractor to a main contractor?\nWhich procurement frameworks, if any, could potentially facilitate this requirement?\nWould you anticipate the requirement being attractive as a standalone contract or a multi-site programme?", "items": [ { "id": "1", "additionalClassifications": [ { "scheme": "CPV", "id": "34926000", "description": "Car park control equipment" }, { "scheme": "CPV", "id": "45213312", "description": "Car park building construction work" }, { "scheme": "CPV", "id": "98351000", "description": "Car park management services" } ], "deliveryAddresses": [ { "region": "UKC", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKD", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKE", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKF", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKG", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKH", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKI", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKJ", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" }, { "region": "UKK", "country": "GB", "countryName": "United Kingdom" } ], "relatedLot": "1" } ], "mainProcurementCategory": "works", "aboveThreshold": false, "techniques": { "hasFrameworkAgreement": true }, "lots": [ { "id": "1", "suitability": { "sme": true }, "contractPeriod": { "startDate": "2026-10-16T00:00:00Z", "endDate": "2027-10-15T23:59:59Z" }, "status": "planning" } ], "communication": { "futureNoticeDate": "2026-10-15T23:59:59Z" }, "status": "planning" }, "language": "en", "extensions": [ "https://standard.open-contracting.org/profiles/eu/latest/en/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_amendment_rationale_classifications_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_budget_breakdown_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_contract_completion_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_documentation_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_pagination_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_suitability_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/portaledcahn/ocds_Links_extension/main/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cabinetoffice/ocds_uk_extension/main/extension.json" ] }, "versionedRelease": { "ocid": "ocds-h6vhtk-0779c4", "initiationType": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "tender" } ], "parties": [ { "id": "GB-PPON-PRYN-3355-CPMV", "name": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "Guildford Borough Council" } ], "identifier": { "scheme": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "GB-PPON" } ], "id": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "PRYN-3355-CPMV" } ] }, "address": { "streetAddress": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "Millmead House, Millmead" } ], "locality": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "Guildford" } ], "postalCode": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "GU2 4BB" } ], "country": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "GB" } ], "countryName": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "United Kingdom" } ], "region": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "UKJ25" } ] }, "contactPoint": { "name": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "Procurement" } ], "email": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "procurement@guildford.gov.uk" } ], "telephone": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "+441483505050" } ] }, "roles": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": [ "buyer" ] } ], "details": { "classifications": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": [ { "scheme": "UK_CA_TYPE", "id": "publicAuthoritySubCentralGovernment", "description": "Public authority - sub-central government" } ] } ] } } ], "buyer": { "id": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "GB-PPON-PRYN-3355-CPMV" } ], "name": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "Guildford Borough Council" } ] }, "planning": { "milestones": [ { "id": "engagement", "type": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "engagement" } ], "description": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "Dear Supplier,\nThe Council is currently undertaking pre-market engagement in relation to potential suicide prevention works at its multi-storey car parks.\nFor one car park work is required to install new vehicular edge protection alongside suicide prevention works, and for all car parks the Council has a requirement to consider immediate, temporary suicide prevention remedies.\nThe purpose of this exercise is to gain a better understanding of the current market, available solutions, delivery models, indicative costs, timescales, technical considerations and potential procurement routes. The information gathered will help inform the Council’s requirements and future procurement strategy.\nPlease note that this is not a procurement exercise, invitation to tender or request for a quotation. Responses will not be evaluated, scored or used to select suppliers, and participation in this exercise will not provide any advantage or disadvantage in relation to any future procurement opportunity.\nThe Council is not committed to proceeding with a procurement exercise as a result of this market engagement and reserves the right to amend, defer or not proceed with any future requirement.\nAny information provided should therefore be considered as market intelligence only. Suppliers should not incur any costs in responding, and the Council will not be responsible for any costs associated with participation in this exercise.\nWe would be grateful if you could provide a response in PDF form and return it by Thursday, 1st October 2026.\nThank you for taking the time to engage with the Council and for sharing your expertise and experience.\nKind regards,\nProcurement\nGuildford Borough Council\nPurpose: To obtain market intelligence to inform the Council’s procurement strategy, technical requirements, delivery model and potential route to market. Responses should be treated as indicative market information and not as a request for a binding quotation.\n1. Supplier Information\nOrganisation name and contact details.\nBrief description of your organisation and relevant capabilities.\nYears of experience delivering suicide prevention / fall-prevention measures.\nRelevant experience in MSCPs.\nRelevant public-sector/local-authority experience.\nDetails of similar projects delivered within the last 5 years, including approximate value and location.\n2. Understanding of the Requirement\nPlease describe your understanding of the challenges associated with implementing suicide prevention measures within operational MSCPs.\nWhat factors should a local authority consider when determining the most appropriate solution?\nWhat should a local authority consider in determining an appropriate immediate temporary solution to suicide prevention works.\nAre there particular characteristics of MSCPs that materially affect the design or installation approach?\n3. Potential Solutions\nType/design of barrier or prevention system.\nTypical height/specification.\nMaterials and expected lifespan.\nFixing/anchoring methodology.\nCompatibility with existing structures.\nImpact on ventilation, lighting and drainage.\nStructural load implications\nCombining installation of vehicular edge protection measures\nFire strategy considerations\nImpact on vehicle/pedestrian movements.\nAnti-climb considerations.\nVisibility/aesthetics.\nMaintenance requirements of the system and the external facades.\nResistance to vandalism/weathering.\n4. Design Responsibility\nWould you typically provide the design?\nIf so, what level of design would you undertake?\nHow would structural engineering input /fire safety assessments be included?\nWould you expect the Council to appoint an independent structural engineer/design consultant?\nCan you provide a design-and-build solution?\nWhat information would you require from the Council to develop a proposal?\n5. Installation\nTypical installation methodology.\nTypical programme for one MSCP.\nExpected mobilisation period.\nNumber of operatives required.\nWorking-at-height arrangements.\nRequirements for temporary closures or traffic management.\nAbility to undertake works while the car park remains operational.\nTypical installation productivity (e.g. metres/day).\n6. Disruption\nWhat level of disruption should the Council expect?\nCan works be phased? Yes this can happen definitely\nCan individual decks/areas be isolated rather than closing the whole facility?\nWhat temporary protection would be required?\nWhat measures would you recommend to maintain public safety during installation?\n7. Programme\nIndicative timescale from appointment to completion.\nLead times for materials.\nCurrent capacity to undertake works.\nAny factors likely to affect programme.\nWhether works could be delivered across multiple MSCPs as a programme.\n8. Cost Information\nTypical cost basis (e.g. £/linear metre).\nIndicative design costs.\nSurvey/investigation costs.\nInstallation costs.\nTraffic management/temporary works. Scaffolding will be a considerable cost depending on whether the system can be installed inside or not. But in reality there will need to be a safe system of working in place and this will cost.\nAny significant additional costs.\nTypical percentage allowance for preliminaries/overheads.\nMaintenance/whole-life costs.\n9. Procurement / Commercial Model\nWhat procurement route would you consider most appropriate?\nWould you recommend design and build; separate design consultant and construction contractor; specialist supplier appointed directly; framework; or another model?\nCould your organisation act as principal contractor?\nCould you work as a specialist subcontractor to a main contractor?\nWhich procurement frameworks, if any, could potentially facilitate this requirement?\nWould you anticipate the requirement being attractive as a standalone contract or a multi-site programme?" } ], "dueDate": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "2026-10-01T23:59:59Z" } ], "status": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "scheduled" } ] } ], "documents": [ { "id": "090677-2026", "documentType": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "marketEngagementNotice" } ], "noticeType": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "UK2" } ], "description": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender" } ], "url": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/090677-2026" } ], "datePublished": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00" } ], "format": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "text/html" } ] } ] }, "tender": { "id": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "ocds-h6vhtk-0779c4" } ], "legalBasis": { "id": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "2023/54" } ], "scheme": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "UKPGA" } ], "uri": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/54/contents" } ] }, "title": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "Suicide Prevention Works – Multi-Storey Car Parks" } ], "description": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "Dear Supplier,\nThe Council is currently undertaking pre-market engagement in relation to potential suicide prevention works at its multi-storey car parks.\nFor one car park work is required to install new vehicular edge protection alongside suicide prevention works, and for all car parks the Council has a requirement to consider immediate, temporary suicide prevention remedies.\nThe purpose of this exercise is to gain a better understanding of the current market, available solutions, delivery models, indicative costs, timescales, technical considerations and potential procurement routes. The information gathered will help inform the Council’s requirements and future procurement strategy.\nPlease note that this is not a procurement exercise, invitation to tender or request for a quotation. Responses will not be evaluated, scored or used to select suppliers, and participation in this exercise will not provide any advantage or disadvantage in relation to any future procurement opportunity.\nThe Council is not committed to proceeding with a procurement exercise as a result of this market engagement and reserves the right to amend, defer or not proceed with any future requirement.\nAny information provided should therefore be considered as market intelligence only. Suppliers should not incur any costs in responding, and the Council will not be responsible for any costs associated with participation in this exercise.\nWe would be grateful if you could provide a response in PDF form and return it by Thursday, 1st October 2026.\nThank you for taking the time to engage with the Council and for sharing your expertise and experience.\nKind regards,\nProcurement\nGuildford Borough Council\nPurpose: To obtain market intelligence to inform the Council’s procurement strategy, technical requirements, delivery model and potential route to market. Responses should be treated as indicative market information and not as a request for a binding quotation.\n1. Supplier Information\nOrganisation name and contact details.\nBrief description of your organisation and relevant capabilities.\nYears of experience delivering suicide prevention / fall-prevention measures.\nRelevant experience in MSCPs.\nRelevant public-sector/local-authority experience.\nDetails of similar projects delivered within the last 5 years, including approximate value and location.\n2. Understanding of the Requirement\nPlease describe your understanding of the challenges associated with implementing suicide prevention measures within operational MSCPs.\nWhat factors should a local authority consider when determining the most appropriate solution?\nWhat should a local authority consider in determining an appropriate immediate temporary solution to suicide prevention works.\nAre there particular characteristics of MSCPs that materially affect the design or installation approach?\n3. Potential Solutions\nType/design of barrier or prevention system.\nTypical height/specification.\nMaterials and expected lifespan.\nFixing/anchoring methodology.\nCompatibility with existing structures.\nImpact on ventilation, lighting and drainage.\nStructural load implications\nCombining installation of vehicular edge protection measures\nFire strategy considerations\nImpact on vehicle/pedestrian movements.\nAnti-climb considerations.\nVisibility/aesthetics.\nMaintenance requirements of the system and the external facades.\nResistance to vandalism/weathering.\n4. Design Responsibility\nWould you typically provide the design?\nIf so, what level of design would you undertake?\nHow would structural engineering input /fire safety assessments be included?\nWould you expect the Council to appoint an independent structural engineer/design consultant?\nCan you provide a design-and-build solution?\nWhat information would you require from the Council to develop a proposal?\n5. Installation\nTypical installation methodology.\nTypical programme for one MSCP.\nExpected mobilisation period.\nNumber of operatives required.\nWorking-at-height arrangements.\nRequirements for temporary closures or traffic management.\nAbility to undertake works while the car park remains operational.\nTypical installation productivity (e.g. metres/day).\n6. Disruption\nWhat level of disruption should the Council expect?\nCan works be phased? Yes this can happen definitely\nCan individual decks/areas be isolated rather than closing the whole facility?\nWhat temporary protection would be required?\nWhat measures would you recommend to maintain public safety during installation?\n7. Programme\nIndicative timescale from appointment to completion.\nLead times for materials.\nCurrent capacity to undertake works.\nAny factors likely to affect programme.\nWhether works could be delivered across multiple MSCPs as a programme.\n8. Cost Information\nTypical cost basis (e.g. £/linear metre).\nIndicative design costs.\nSurvey/investigation costs.\nInstallation costs.\nTraffic management/temporary works. Scaffolding will be a considerable cost depending on whether the system can be installed inside or not. But in reality there will need to be a safe system of working in place and this will cost.\nAny significant additional costs.\nTypical percentage allowance for preliminaries/overheads.\nMaintenance/whole-life costs.\n9. Procurement / Commercial Model\nWhat procurement route would you consider most appropriate?\nWould you recommend design and build; separate design consultant and construction contractor; specialist supplier appointed directly; framework; or another model?\nCould your organisation act as principal contractor?\nCould you work as a specialist subcontractor to a main contractor?\nWhich procurement frameworks, if any, could potentially facilitate this requirement?\nWould you anticipate the requirement being attractive as a standalone contract or a multi-site programme?" } ], "items": [ { "id": "1", "additionalClassifications": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": [ { "scheme": "CPV", "id": "34926000", "description": "Car park control equipment" }, { "scheme": "CPV", "id": "45213312", "description": "Car park building construction work" }, { "scheme": "CPV", "id": "98351000", "description": "Car park management services" } ] } ], "deliveryAddresses": [ { "region": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "UKC" } ], "country": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "GB" } ], "countryName": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "United Kingdom" } ] }, { "region": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "UKD" } ], "country": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "GB" } ], "countryName": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "United Kingdom" } ] }, { "region": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "UKE" } ], "country": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "GB" } ], "countryName": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "United Kingdom" } ] }, { "region": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "UKF" } ], "country": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "GB" } ], "countryName": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "United Kingdom" } ] }, { "region": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "UKG" } ], "country": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "GB" } ], "countryName": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "United Kingdom" } ] }, { "region": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "UKH" } ], "country": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "GB" } ], "countryName": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "United Kingdom" } ] }, { "region": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "UKI" } ], "country": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "GB" } ], "countryName": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "United Kingdom" } ] }, { "region": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "UKJ" } ], "country": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "GB" } ], "countryName": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "United Kingdom" } ] }, { "region": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "UKK" } ], "country": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "GB" } ], "countryName": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "United Kingdom" } ] } ], "relatedLot": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "1" } ] } ], "mainProcurementCategory": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "works" } ], "aboveThreshold": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": false } ], "techniques": { "hasFrameworkAgreement": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": true } ] }, "lots": [ { "id": "1", "suitability": { "sme": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": true } ] }, "contractPeriod": { "startDate": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "2026-10-16T00:00:00Z" } ], "endDate": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "2027-10-15T23:59:59Z" } ] }, "status": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "planning" } ] } ], "communication": { "futureNoticeDate": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "2026-10-15T23:59:59Z" } ] }, "status": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "planning" } ] }, "language": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": "en" } ], "extensions": [ { "releaseID": "090677-2026", "releaseDate": "2026-09-24T15:25:08+01:00", "releaseTag": [ "planning" ], "value": [ "https://standard.open-contracting.org/profiles/eu/latest/en/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_amendment_rationale_classifications_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_budget_breakdown_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_contract_completion_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_documentation_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_pagination_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-contracting-extensions/ocds_suitability_extension/master/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/portaledcahn/ocds_Links_extension/main/extension.json", "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cabinetoffice/ocds_uk_extension/main/extension.json" ] } ] } } ] }